Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105(16), 6167–6172.Ĭoates, J. Endogenous steroids and financial risk-taking on a London trading floor. Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? Working paper.Ĭoates, J. Why can’t a woman bid like a man? Working paper.Ĭleave, B., Nikiforakis, N., & Slonim, R. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, 809–842.Ĭhen, Y., Katsucak, P., & Ozdenoren, E. Genetic variation in preferences for giving and risk-taking. T., Johnnesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105(10), 3721–3726.Ĭesarini, D., Dawes, C. Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. H., Johannesson, M., Lichtenstein, P., & Wallace, B. Gender difference in risk-taking: a meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 2327–2330.īyrnes, J. High-testosterone men reject low Ultimatum Game offers. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 31(3), 301–325.īurnham, T. Attitudes toward risk: theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 395–407.īinswanger, H. Attitudes toward risk: experimental measurement in rural India. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41(3), 167–193.īinswanger, H. Risk aversion and physical prowess: prediction, choice and bias. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1115.īall, S., Eckel, C., & Heracleous, M. A preliminary investigation of the association between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio. Organizational and activational effects of sex steroids on brain and behavior: a reanalysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 384–390.Īrnold, A. Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Thus, the 2D:4D ratio partially explains variation in financial risk-taking behavior within and between sexes and offers evidence of a biological basis for risk-taking behavior.Īpicella, C. Moreover, for men and women at the extremes of the digit-ratio distribution the difference in risk-taking disappears. We further find that the ratio partially explains the variation in risk-taking between the sexes. In financially motivated decision-making tasks, we find that men and women with smaller 2D:4D ratios chose significantly riskier options. A smaller 2D:4D ratio has been linked to higher exposure to prenatal testosterone relative to estradiol, with men having lower ratios than women. We explore a potential biological basis of risk-taking variation within and between the sexes by studying how the ratio between the length of the second and fourth fingers (2D:4D) predicts risk-taking. Many important decisions involve financial risk, and substantial evidence suggests that women tend to be more risk averse than men.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |